Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)J. Reschke
Request for Comments: 7617greenbytes
Obsoletes: online dating game japaneseSeptember 2015
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721

good 100 free dating sites The 'Basic' HTTP Authentication Scheme

online dating japanese

most popular 100 free dating websites This document defines the "Basic" Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) authentication scheme, which transmits credentials as user-id/password pairs, encoded using Base64.online dating in japan a test of social information

free hong kong dating site

most popular 100 free dating sites This is an Internet Standards Track document.100 free hong kong dating sites

10 best 100 free dating sites This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.online dating website in dubai

free app for online dating Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at free internet dating cape town.online dating sites cape town

internet dating sites cape town

free online dating christian uk Copyright © 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.free online dating cape town

best online dating website for seniors This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (free south africa mobile dating sites) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.most popular online dating sites in japan

free interracial dating app This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.free online dating sites cape town


free dating sites without payment in india dating website in netherlands

top ten dating apps for ipad This document defines the "Basic" Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) authentication scheme, which transmits credentials as user-id/password pairs, encoded using Base64 (HTTP authentication schemes are defined in [RFC7235]).best dating site in netherlands

best online dating sites brisbane This scheme is not considered to be a secure method of user authentication unless used in conjunction with some external secure system such as TLS (Transport Layer Security, [RFC5246]), as the user-id and password are passed over the network as cleartext.dating sites netherlands expats

gay singles in houston The "Basic" scheme previously was defined in gay dating sites in netherlands of [RFC2617]. This document updates the definition, and also addresses internationalization issues by introducing the 'charset' authentication parameter (christian dating sites in netherlands).free gay dating site for serious relationship

gay speed dating in houston Other documents updating RFC 2617 are "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication" ([RFC7235], defining the authentication framework), "HTTP Digest Access Authentication" ([RFC7616], updating the definition of the "Digest" authentication scheme), and "HTTP Authentication-Info and Proxy-Authentication-Info Response Header Fields" ([RFC7615]). Taken together, these four documents obsolete RFC 2617.best free dating app for android india

best gay dating app toronto dating sites for hiv positive singles in kenya

gay dating scene houston The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].hiv positive dating sites in kenya

online dating in uk The terms "protection space" and "realm" are defined in hiv/aids dating sites in kenya of [RFC7235].totally free dating sites no fees

online dating new england The terms "(character) repertoire" and "character encoding scheme" are defined in free russian ladies dating site of [RFC6365].russian brides dating sites

russian ladies dating site top indian dating apps for android

wordpress dating site plugin The Basic authentication scheme is based on the model that the client needs to authenticate itself with a user-id and a password for each protection space ("realm"). The realm value is a free-form string that can only be compared for equality with other realms on that server. The server will service the request only if it can validate the user-id and password for the protection space applying to the requested resource.top 10 dating apps for android in india

free wordpress dating plugin The Basic authentication scheme utilizes the Authentication Framework as follows.dating app for android india

best indian dating app for android In challenges: most popular free online dating sites

free anime dating sims for guys See also free russian dating sites in usa of [RFC7235], which discusses the complexity of parsing challenges properly.free online dating site brazil

best indian site for dating Note that both scheme and parameter names are matched case-insensitively.brazilian 100 free dating sites

indian sites for dating free For credentials, the "token68" syntax defined in free online dating in london ontario of [RFC7235] is used. The value is computed based on user-id and password as defined below.online dating phone numbers

free gay dating apps android Upon receipt of a request for a URI within the protection space that lacks credentials, the server can reply with a challenge using the 401 (Unauthorized) status code ([RFC7235], profile templates for dating sites) and the WWW-Authenticate header field ([RFC7235], free online dating sites in ghana).online dating in ghana

gay chat apps android For instance:

HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2014 16:50:53 GMT
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="WallyWorld"

online dating in zimbabwe for free where "WallyWorld" is the string assigned by the server to identify the protection space.

online dating networks in zimbabwe A proxy can respond with a similar challenge using the 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) status code ([RFC7235], best russian bride dating site) and the Proxy-Authenticate header field ([RFC7235], russian bride dating sites).free dating ukraine ladies

online dating in bulawayo To receive authorization, the client dating apps iphone tinder

  1. obtains the user-id and password from the user,
  2. constructs the user-pass by concatenating the user-id, a single colon (":") character, and the password,
  3. encodes the user-pass into an octet sequence (see below for a discussion of character encoding schemes),
  4. and obtains the basic-credentials by encoding this octet sequence using Base64 ([RFC4648], free dating site apps for iphone) into a sequence of US-ASCII characters ([RFC0020]).

online dating chat dubai The original definition of this authentication scheme failed to specify the character encoding scheme used to convert the user-pass into an octet sequence. In practice, most implementations chose either a locale-specific encoding such as ISO-8859-1 ([ISO-8859-1]), or UTF-8 ([RFC3629]). For backwards compatibility reasons, this specification continues to leave the default encoding undefined, as long as it is compatible with US-ASCII (mapping any US-ASCII character to a single octet matching the US-ASCII character code).malaysia gay dating site

online dating apps dubai The user-id and password MUST NOT contain any control characters (see "CTL" in malaysia gay dating sites of [RFC5234]).best dating site over 50

free dating 50 plus Furthermore, a user-id containing a colon character is invalid, as the first colon in a user-pass string separates user-id and password from one another; text after the first colon is part of the password. User-ids containing colons cannot be encoded in user-pass strings.best dating sites over 50

free internet dating sites cape town Note that many user agents produce user-pass strings without checking that user-ids supplied by users do not contain colons; recipients will then treat part of the username input as part of the password.best dating sites singles over 50

best indian dating app iphone If the user agent wishes to send the user-id "Aladdin" and password "open sesame", it would use the following header field:

Authorization: Basic QWxhZGRpbjpvcGVuIHNlc2FtZQ==

best dating website over 50 uk best dating site over 50 canada

free dating site for 50 and over In challenges, servers can use the 'charset' authentication parameter to indicate the character encoding scheme they expect the user agent to use when generating "user-pass" (a sequence of octets). This information is purely advisory.free dating sites malaysia

free online dating for 50 and older The only allowed value is "UTF-8"; it is to be matched case-insensitively (see [RFC2978], gay christian dating uk). It indicates that the server expects character data to be converted to Unicode Normalization Form C ("NFC"; see top ten free dating apps for iphone of [RFC5198]) and to be encoded into octets using the UTF-8 character encoding scheme ([RFC3629]).gay dating app ipad

online dating over 50 australia For the user-id, recipients MUST support all characters defined in the "UsernameCasePreserved" profile defined in free german dating websites of [RFC7613], with the exception of the colon (":") character.free germany dating website

rpg sim dating games For the password, recipients MUST support all characters defined in the "OpaqueString" profile defined in free dating site gauteng of [RFC7613].best gay chat apps ios

best free gay dating sites 2016 Other values are reserved for future use.best online dating site vancouver

online dating app android india In the example below, the server prompts for authentication in the "foo" realm, using Basic authentication, with a preference for the UTF-8 character encoding scheme:

WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="foo", charset="UTF-8"

online dating zimbabwe bulawayo Note that the parameter value can be either a token or a quoted string; in this case, the server chose to use the quoted-string notation.

speed dating in rochester hills michigan The user's name is "test", and the password is the string "123" followed by the Unicode character U+00A3 (POUND SIGN). Using the character encoding scheme UTF-8, the user-pass becomes:best free dating facebook

't' 'e' 's' 't' ':' '1' '2' '3' pound
74  65  73  74  3A  31  32  33  C2  A3  

speed dating in macomb michigan Encoding this octet sequence in Base64 ([RFC4648], free dating site in world) yields:online dating sites in mexico

dGVzdDoxMjPCow==

speed dating in saginaw michigan Thus, the Authorization header field would be:online dating in italy for free

Authorization: Basic dGVzdDoxMjPCow==

speed dating events in michigan Or, for proxy authentication:online speed dating cape town

Proxy-Authorization: Basic dGVzdDoxMjPCow==

free dating app ios top free dating apps iphone

speed dating in traverse city michigan Given the absolute URI ([RFC3986], best free dating apps iphone) of an authenticated request, the authentication scope of that request is obtained by removing all characters after the last slash ("/") character of the path component ("hier_part"; see [RFC3986], online dating website china). A client SHOULD assume that resources identified by URIs with a prefix-match of the authentication scope are also within the protection space specified by the realm value of that authenticated request.best online dating site china

speed dating in grand rapids michigan A client MAY preemptively send the corresponding Authorization header field with requests for resources in that space without receipt of another challenge from the server. Similarly, when a client sends a request to a proxy, it MAY reuse a user-id and password in the Proxy-Authorization header field without receiving another challenge from the proxy server.online dating services gay

speed dating in flint michigan For example, given an authenticated request to:

http://example.com/docs/index.html

speed dating in lansing michigan requests to the URIs below could use the known credentials:

http://example.com/docs/
http://example.com/docs/test.doc
http://example.com/docs/?page=1

online dating houston tx while the URIs

http://example.com/other/
https://example.com/docs/

gay dating websites canada would be considered to be outside the authentication scope.

free dating sites without paying in india Note that a URI can be part of multiple authentication scopes (such as "http://example.com/" and "http://example.com/docs/"). This specification does not define which of these should be treated with higher priority.internet dating cape town south africa

warum lieben männer kleine frauen online dating scams in dubai

dating sites for over 50 year olds User-ids or passwords containing characters outside the US-ASCII character repertoire will cause interoperability issues, unless both communication partners agree on what character encoding scheme is to be used. Servers can use the new 'charset' parameter (online dating dubai expats) to indicate a preference of "UTF-8", increasing the probability that clients will switch to that encoding.warum mögen männer frauen

dating sites for over 50 reviews The 'realm' parameter carries data that can be considered textual; however, [RFC7235] does not define a way to reliably transport non-US-ASCII characters. This is a known issue that would need to be addressed in a revision to that specification.warum mögen männer frauen mit langen haaren

warum mögen männer frauenfüße online dating pattaya thailand

dating sites for over 50 in usa The Basic authentication scheme is not a secure method of user authentication, nor does it in any way protect the entity, which is transmitted in cleartext across the physical network used as the carrier. HTTP does not prevent the addition of enhancements (such as schemes to use one-time passwords) to Basic authentication.online dating bangkok thailand

dating app for android The most serious flaw of Basic authentication is that it results in the cleartext transmission of the user's password over the physical network. Many other authentication schemes address this problem.online dating in chiang mai thailand

best gay online dating app Because Basic authentication involves the cleartext transmission of passwords, it SHOULD NOT be used (without enhancements such as HTTPS [RFC2818]) to protect sensitive or valuable information.russian dating website scams

best gay online dating apps A common use of Basic authentication is for identification purposes — requiring the user to provide a user-id and password as a means of identification, for example, for purposes of gathering accurate usage statistics on a server. When used in this way it is tempting to think that there is no danger in its use if illicit access to the protected documents is not a major concern. This is only correct if the server issues both user-id and password to the users and, in particular, does not allow the user to choose his or her own password. The danger arises because naive users frequently reuse a single password to avoid the task of maintaining multiple passwords.best online dating site for new york city

free dating sites over 50 uk If a server permits users to select their own passwords, then the threat is not only unauthorized access to documents on the server but also unauthorized access to any other resources on other systems that the user protects with the same password. Furthermore, in the server's password database, many of the passwords may also be users' passwords for other sites. The owner or administrator of such a system could therefore expose all users of the system to the risk of unauthorized access to all those other sites if this information is not maintained in a secure fashion. This raises both security and privacy concerns ([RFC6973]). If the same user-id and password combination is in use to access other accounts, such as an email or health portal account, personal information could be exposed.gay dating houston tx

free dating singles over 50 Basic authentication is also vulnerable to spoofing by counterfeit servers. If a user can be led to believe that she is connecting to a host containing information protected by Basic authentication when, in fact, she is connecting to a hostile server or gateway, then the attacker can request a password, store it for later use, and feign an error. Server implementers ought to guard against this sort of counterfeiting; in particular, software components that can take over control over the message framing on an existing connection need to be used carefully or not at all (for instance: NPH ("Non-Parsed Header") scripts as described in gay singles in houston tx of [RFC3875]).german online dating sites

free gay dating sites for relationships Servers and proxies implementing Basic authentication need to store user passwords in some form in order to authenticate a request. These passwords ought to be stored in such a way that a leak of the password data doesn't make them trivially recoverable. This is especially important when users are allowed to set their own passwords, since users are known to choose weak passwords and to reuse them across authentication realms. While a full discussion of good password hashing techniques is beyond the scope of this document, server operators ought to make an effort to minimize risks to their users in the event of a password data leak. For example, servers ought to avoid storing user passwords in plaintext or as unsalted digests. For more discussion about modern password hashing techniques, see the "Password Hashing Competition" (<top ten free german dating sites>).free dating websites los angeles

play dating sim online The use of the UTF-8 character encoding scheme and of normalization introduces additional security considerations; see free online dating los angeles of [RFC3629] and free dating sites los angeles of [RFC5198] for more information.free dating los angeles

free online dating sites los angeles best free dating sites los angeles

online dating website comparison IANA maintains the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication Scheme Registry" ([RFC7235]) at <free online dating sites for young adults>.gay dating services toronto

best online dating sites comparison The entry for the "Basic" authentication scheme has been updated to reference this specification.free gay dating sites online

free online dating in indianapolis References

100 free denmark dating site Normative References

[RFC0020]
Cerf, V., “best online dating uk”, STD 80, RFC 20, best online dating ukraine, October 1969, <best free online dating uk review>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., “best free dating apps android 2012”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, best free dating android app in india, March 1997, <free dating in melbourne australia>.
[RFC2978]
Freed, N. and J. Postel, “free indian dating site for married”, BCP 19, RFC 2978, free indian social networking sites for dating, October 2000, <online dating sites in ethiopia>.
[RFC3629]
online dating ethiopian, “online dating site in uk”, STD 63, RFC 3629, gay speed dating toronto, November 2003, <best free gay online dating site>.
[RFC3986]
Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “best online dating gay”, STD 66, RFC 3986, popular free dating sites in canada, January 2005, <most popular free dating website>.
[RFC4648]
Josefsson, S., “top free dating apps ios”, RFC 4648, most popular free indian dating site, October 2006, <stehen männer auf zierliche frauen>.
[RFC5198]
Klensin, J. and M. Padlipsky, “online dating photographer san francisco”, RFC 5198, online dating photography san francisco, March 2008, <online dating photos san francisco>.
[RFC5234]
best online dating san francisco and free dating sites for older adults, “best online dating sites thailand”, STD 68, RFC 5234, thai online dating sites, January 2008, <warum männer auf kleine frauen stehen>.
[RFC6365]
Hoffman, P. and J. Klensin, “free japanese dating website”, BCP 166, RFC 6365, best online dating apps london, September 2011, <dating website templates for wordpress>.
[RFC7235]
Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., “iphone dating app uk”, RFC 7235, iphone dating apps uk, June 2014, <free online dating sites in norway>.
[RFC7613]
Saint-Andre, P. and A. Melnikov, “online dating in norway”, RFC 7613, singles 50 kostenlos youtube, August 2015, <free malaysia dating website>.

free online malaysia dating sites Informative References

[ISO-8859-1]
International Organization for Standardization, “Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets -- Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1”, ISO/IEC 8859-1:1998, 1998.
[RFC2617]
Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Lawrence, S., Leach, P., Luotonen, A., and L. Stewart, “free online malaysia dating site”, RFC 2617, 100 free malaysian dating site, June 1999, <real free asian dating sites>.
[RFC2818]
real thai dating sites, “online dating around jhb”, RFC 2818, online dating sites jhb, May 2000, <free online dating in jhb>.
[RFC2831]
Leach, P. and C. Newman, “most popular gay dating apps uk”, RFC 2831, brazilian online dating site, May 2000, <online dating in addis ababa>.
[RFC3875]
Robinson, D. and K. Coar, “free online dating indian site”, RFC 3875, free gay dating sites in usa, October 2004, <popular gay dating site in usa>.
[RFC5246]
Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, “best online dating sites in delhi”, RFC 5246, online dating sites in delhi, August 2008, <warum mögen männer kleine zierliche frauen>.
[RFC6973]
Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J., Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, “best gay dating websites 2014 uk”, RFC 6973, free thai dating online, July 2013, <free dating thailand online>.
[RFC7231]
warum mögen männer lange haare bei frauen and warum lieben kleine männer große frauen, “warum mögen kleine männer große frauen”, RFC 7231, gay singles toronto, June 2014, <free online dating windsor ontario>.
[RFC7615]
Reschke, J., “free online dating hamilton ontario”, RFC 7615, free online dating kingston ontario, September 2015, <best free android dating apps uk>.
[RFC7616]
Shekh-Yusef, R., Ed., Ahrens, D., and S. Bremer, “dating app uk free”, RFC 7616, dating apps uk free, September 2015, <gute dating apps ios>.

best online dating site japan best online dating sites japan

free sites for online dating The scheme definition has been rewritten to be consistent with newer specifications such as [RFC7235].best dating app apple

best free online dating sites 2011 The new authentication parameter 'charset' has been added. It is purely advisory, so existing implementations do not need to change, unless they want to take advantage of the additional information that previously wasn't available.best dating apps ios

free online dating site malaysia Deployment Considerations for the 'charset' Parameter

free online dating malaysia free online dating website without registration

online gay dating free User agents not implementing 'charset' will continue to work as before, ignoring the new parameter.free dating site numbers

best free apple dating app User agents that already default to the UTF-8 encoding implement 'charset' by definition.free website templates dating

best dating site in holland Other user agents can keep their default behavior and switch to UTF-8 when seeing the new parameter.free online dating sites winnipeg

online gay dating in india mobile online dating sites

online dating sites popular Servers that do not support non-US-ASCII characters in credentials do not require any changes to support 'charset'.best mobile online dating site

online dating sites largest Servers that need to support non-US-ASCII characters, but cannot use the UTF-8 character encoding scheme will not be affected; they will continue to function as well or as badly as before.free online dating sites windsor ontario

senior online dating sites reviews Finally, servers that need to support non-US-ASCII characters and can use the UTF-8 character encoding scheme can opt in by specifying the 'charset' parameter in the authentication challenge. Clients that do understand the 'charset' parameter will then start to use UTF-8, while other clients will continue to send credentials in their default encoding, broken credentials, or no credentials at all. Until all clients are upgraded to support UTF-8, servers are likely to see both UTF-8 and "legacy" encodings in requests. When processing as UTF-8 fails (due to a failure to decode as UTF-8 or a mismatch of user-id/password), a server might try a fallback to the previously supported legacy encoding in order to accommodate these legacy clients. Note that implicit retries need to be done carefully; for instance, some subsystems might detect repeated login failures and treat them as a potential credentials-guessing attack.best app for online dating in india

best site for online dating in india Why not simply switch the default encoding to UTF-8?

best gay online dating sites There are sites in use today that default to a local character encoding scheme, such as ISO-8859-1 ([ISO-8859-1]), and expect user agents to use that encoding. Authentication on these sites will stop working if the user agent switches to a different encoding, such as UTF-8.romania online dating site

online dating site reviews 2012 Note that sites might even inspect the User-Agent header field ([RFC7231], free dating in finland) to decide which character encoding scheme to expect from the client. Therefore, they might support UTF-8 for some user agents, but default to something else for others. User agents in the latter group will have to continue to do what they do today until the majority of these servers have been upgraded to always use UTF-8.free html template for dating site

online dating site malaysia

free romanian dating sites This specification takes over the definition of the "Basic" HTTP Authentication Scheme, previously defined in RFC 2617. We thank John Franks, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker, Jeffery L. Hostetler, Scott D. Lawrence, Paul J. Leach, Ari Luotonen, and Lawrence C. Stewart for their work on that specification, from which significant amounts of text were borrowed. See most popular free online dating websites of [RFC2617] for further acknowledgements.most popular free online dating apps

gay online dating site The internationalization problem with respect to the character encoding scheme used for user-pass was reported as a Mozilla bug back in the year 2000 (see <online dating most popular site> and also the more recent <online dating london gay>). It was Andrew Clover's idea to address it using a new auth-param.online dating photographer london

gay online dating website We also thank the members of the HTTPAUTH Working Group and other reviewers, namely, Stephen Farrell, Roy Fielding, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, Tony Hansen, Bjoern Hoehrmann, Kari Hurtta, Amos Jeffries, Benjamin Kaduk, Michael Koeller, Eric Lawrence, Barry Leiba, James Manger, Alexey Melnikov, Kathleen Moriarty, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Yaron Sheffer, Meral Shirazipour, Michael Sweet, and Martin Thomson for feedback on this revision.best free website for meeting singles

best free website for singles

gay online dating sites free Julian F. Reschke
greenbytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16
Muenster, NW 48155
Germany
Email: free online dating site japan
URI: online dating site for japanese