yeeva partnersuche youtube This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions of section 3 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668.partnervermittlung kolumbien quote
yeeva partnersuche yoga Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.partnervermittlung kolumbien quoten
partnersuche im internet test adresse Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.foreign dating chat
free famous dating sites This Internet-Draft will expire in November 2004.100 free best dating sites
free recommended dating sites Copyright © The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.free best dating sites in the world
best dating sites to meet millionaires This document specifies a set of methods and headers ancillary to HTTP/1.1 (RFC2616) and Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV, RFC2518) for the management of resource locking (collision avoidance). It updates those sections from RFC2518 that specify WebDAV's locking features.free online chatting and dating websites
partnersuche online ohne anmeldung xp christliche singletreffen berlin [free chatting and dating sites in india: Note that this document is not a product of the WebDAV working group. It is just an experiment to study the feasability of extracing the locking feature into a separate specification. --reschke] www partnersuche deutschland youtube [free online chatting and dating sites: This version of this document doesn't yet contain any new or rewritten text - it only contains text copied verbatim fro RFC2518 and GULP. It's sole purpose is be a reference point for all future changes. --reschke] free chatting and dating websites
partnersuche online ohne anmeldung xing Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments to the WebDAV working group at 100 free chatting and dating sites, which may be joined by sending a message with subject "subscribe" to free international dating and marriage site.completely free international dating sites
|partnervermittlung slowenien maut||change||closed||1999-06-07||beste partnersuche kostenlos|
|partnervermittlung droben text||change||closed|
|christliche singles österreich zeitung||change||closed||free latest dating sites in usa|
|partnervermittlung droben akkorde||change||closed||partnervermittlung droben agentur|
|free good online dating sites||change||open||1998-11-09||partnervermittlung droben noten|
|partnersuche worms online||change||open||1998-11-24||www partnersuche kostenlos münchen|
|chat online gratis en ingles||change||open||1998-11-29||biggest international dating sites|
|new free indian dating site||change||open|
|free new online dating sites 2013||change||open||1999-05-18||free new dating site 2013|
|online dating for the rich||change||open||1999-06-15|
|international dating chat||change||open||1999-06-07||partnervermittlung slowenien vignette|
|christliche singles österreich kostenlos||change||open||1999-06-07||frau sucht mann zwecks heirat|
|millionaire matchmaker dating sites||change||open||1999-06-07||millionaire matchmaker online dating|
|millionaire matchmaker patti stanger dating website||change||open||1999-06-07||kostenlos frauen kennen lernen hamburg|
|partnersuche de spam email||change||open||1999-06-07||100 free chatting and dating site|
|partnersuche de spam gmail||change||open||1999-06-07||kostenlos asiatische frauen kennenlernen|
|www partnersuche kostenlos hannover||change||open||1999-06-07||www partnersuche kostenlos hamburg|
|partnersuche de spam facebook||change||open||1999-06-07||partnersuche de spam filter|
|single schweiz kostenlos online||change||open||1999-07-23||free popular dating sites uk|
|spam von partnersuche.de||change||open||1999-07-23||single schweiz kostenlos runterladen|
|kostenlos russische frauen kennenlernen||change||open||1999-11-23||rumänische frauen kostenlos kennenlernen|
|online dating richard la ruina||change||open||1999-11-26||online dating for rich man|
|online dating richtig anschreiben||change||open||2000-01-27||online dating richtige fragen|
|online dating richtig||change||open||2000-03-04||online dating richtiges profilbild|
|partnervermittlung frauen slowenien||change||open|
|kostenlos frauen kennen lernen englisch||change||open||2000-07-11||partnersuche de spam ordner|
|partnersuche de spam thunderbird||change||open||international online free dating sites|
|singlebörse frankfurt oder||change||open||international european dating sites|
|partnersuche in oberösterreich||change||open|
|partnersuche oberösterreich jobs||change||open||partnersuche de spam sms|
|partnersuche de spam samsung||change||open||foreign girlfriend dating site|
|partnersuche de spam blockieren||change||open||good foreign dating sites|
|partnersuche oberösterreich datenservice||change||open||kostenlos frauen kennen lernen youtube|
|free dating international dating site||change||open||international online dating tips|
|partnersuche.de spam mails||change||open||single schweiz kostenlos telefonieren|
|partnersuche darmstadt dieburg||change||open||partnersuche oberösterreich heute|
|funny things to write about yourself on a dating site||change||open|
|good things to write about yourself on a dating site||change||open|
|reiche frau sucht junge männer||change||open||international dating chat room|
|partnersuche jappy de||change||open||partnersuche jappy gb|
|partnersuche oberösterreich zeitung||change||open|
|partnersuche oberösterreich zamg||change||open||partnersuche in heidelberg|
|partnersuche jappy anmelden||change||open||free top online dating sites|
|chat mit anwalt kostenlos||change||open||dating website for millionaires|
|dating sites for millionaires in the uk||change||open||2004-04-14||dating sites for millionaires in australia|
|find dating site for millionaires||change||open||2004-04-25||best dating site for millionaires|
|free dating sites for millionaires||change||open||2004-04-25||partnersuche heidelberg university|
|partnersuche de spam junk extract-locking (type: change, status: open)|
|yeeva partnersuche vergleich [email protected]||2004-04-14||Locking extracted from RFC2518.|
|Associated changes in this document: things to write about yourself on a dating website.|
|beste singlebörse frankfurt updated-rfc2068 (type: change, status: open)|
|singles mit kind partnersuche kostenlos münchen [email protected]||2004-04-25||Update references of RFC2068 to either RFC2396 or RFC2616.|
|single schweiz kostenlos xp import-rfc3253-stuff (type: change, status: open)|
|yeeva partnersuche deutschland [email protected]||2004-04-25||Import error marshalling and terminology from RFC3253.|
|free best dating site in the world free international gay dating sites (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche online ohne anmeldung spielen [email protected]||1998-11-09||Perform a thorough review of the specification to ensure that URI and URL are used correctly, and consistently throughout.|
|Resolution: Seems to have been deferred: free most popular dating sites, but there is some follow on discussion on what exactly needs to be clarified: top 10 best international dating sites, but no specific action was concluded besides the fact that we don't need to wait for RFC2396 to be updated or request any changes/clarifications to that.|
|kv schweiz job speed dating free top dating sites (type: change, status: open)|
|popular online dating websites [email protected]||1998-11-24||The discussion of generating UUID node fields without using the IEEE 802 address in reiche frau sucht partner can be moved to an appendix.|
|partnerbörse nord bewertungen [email protected]||2004-04-24||Plan: get rid of the section altogether and refer to draft-mealling-uuid-urn.|
|single schweiz kostenlos youtube partnersuche jappy user (type: change, status: open)|
|partnervermittlung slowenien youtube [email protected]||1998-11-29||If URL Ub is locked, creating a lock-null resource, then if a COPY is performed listing Ub as the destination, COPY will remove the lock-null resource, removing the lock, then perform the copy. A note needs to be added stating that the delete performed by the Overwrite header is atomic with the rest of the operation.|
|Resolution: LNRs removed. See discussions preceding conclusion: free new dating sites.|
|free best dating sites 2016 025_LOCK_REFRESH_BY_METHODS (type: change, status: open)|
|Jim Amsden: The specification requires a lock to be refreshed if any method is executed, by anybody, on a locked resource. This can cause some performance problems. More importantly, the semantics of this refresh do not seem to be right -- why should a random GET by a third party cause all locks to be refreshed?|
|Resolution: We should remove the mention of this behavior in 2518: free to use online dating sites|
|totally free to use dating sites free to use dating sites australia (type: change, status: open)|
|partnervermittlung slowenien yachtcharter [email protected]||1999-05-18||free to use gay dating sites states that if a lock cannot be granted to all resources in a hierarchy, a 409 status response must be issued. Yet, the example in free easy to use dating sites which demonstrates this uses a 207.|
|famous online dating sites [email protected]||2004-04-24||Comment: 207 is correct, fix the bad spec text.|
|free to use dating website 100 free to use dating sites (type: change, status: open)|
|1999-06-15||Keith Wannamaker: best free to use dating sites explicitly states that the response from a successful lock request MUST include the Lock-Token header, yet the examples in 8.10.8, 8.10.9, and 8.10.10 aren't compliant with this requirement, and should be updated.|
|Resolution: Make obvious editing changes to the examples: free to use dating sites uk|
|what is the best free dating site 2013 online dating foreign (type: change, status: closed)|
|partnersuche online ohne anmeldung online [email protected]||1999-06-07||Jason Crawford's list of lock issues sent to the list.|
|Resolution: Replace with list of distinct issues 040_LOCK_ISSUES_??.|
|online dating overseas stiftung warentest partnersuche internet (type: change, status: open)|
|mann sucht frau kostenlos xp [email protected]||1999-06-07||
top international dating websites: ""Having a lock token provides no special access rights..."
I suggest that the phrase "owned by another party" be added in this first sentence to distinguish between owning and having. It speaks of "having" in this sentence but not subsequently. In fact "submitting" might be an even better word than having.
|partnersuche online ohne anmeldung multiplayer [email protected]||2004-04-24||Agreed, use "submitting".|
|gay international dating website reiche frau sucht jungen lover (type: change, status: open)|
|junge singles im saarland [email protected]||1999-06-07||
partnersuche jappy profil: "... However resource are free to return any URI scheme so long
as it meets the uniqueness requirements."
This is technically correct, but it might also be useful to say that the scheme should make the URI be readily recognizable as a *LOCK* state token in the event that other types of state tokens exist. I mention this because we seem to have created the possibility of other types of state tokens. -- Your call. :-)
|partnervermittlung oldenburg xxl [email protected]||2004-04-24||Disagreement: any URI scheme can be used as a lock token. Specifications that define other types of state tokens will have to take care of distinguishing them inside an "If" header.|
|partnersuche sachsen anhalt zerbst stiftung warentest partnersuche deutschland (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche online ohne anmeldung deutsch [email protected]||1999-06-07||
partnersuche jappy texte Write lock.
I believe this definition of a write lock is not right... or not complete... judging from what I read elsewhere. I believe one can do these operations without a write lock... as long as someone else doesn't have a write lock on the resources effected. I also believe it doesn't prevent LOCK requests in the case of shared locks.
|singles im saarland heute [email protected]||2004-04-24||Clarify as part of rewriting the general semantics. The point about shared locks is correct, though.|
|partnersuche jappy telefonnummer partnersuche jappy quotes (type: change, status: open)|
|3d chat erwachsene [email protected]||1999-06-07||
alleinerziehende väter kennenlernen kostenlos Write Locks and Collections.
It says that if members are locked in a conflicting manner, then their collection can't be locked. That seems ambiguously safe to say, but I suspect that text should mention depth since if the parent lock request is depth 0, I don't think we let the members lock state effect the success of the LOCK request. The possible exception is what we said about protecting a URI that was used to perform a lock (of a member of the collection). I'm not sure what we'd like to say for that. In the advanced collection meetings we refered to these being "protected" and avoided speaking about "lock"ing the URI. This creates an odd situation though.
|partnersuche oberösterreich nachrichten partnerbörsen kostenlos xp (type: change, status: open)|
|partnerbörse in deutschland [email protected]||1999-06-07||
partnersuche schweiz akademiker deutschland Write Locks and COPY/MOVE
It says that a lock doesn't move with a moved resource. Of course if the lock is on the resource, not the URI, it should move with the resource. But then we have the caveat that we are also protecting the LOCK'd URI. I think the rule should be that if we submit the locktoken with the MOVE request, we are allowed to have the LOCK move with the resource and the lock will now protect a different URI. Also, ALL locks in the subtree must be submitted or the MOVE must fail because otherwise it would break our URI protection rule.
|erfolgreichste partnersuche deutschlands [email protected]||2004-04-24||Clarify as part of incorporating GULP (locks do not MOVE).|
|ukraine international dating chat free online spanish (type: change, status: open)|
|deutschlands beliebteste partnerbörse [email protected]||1999-06-07||
Upon cursory reading of the rfc 2518 sec 8.10.4 through 8.11 I was confused by
the plethoria of error codes. Nothing seems to unify them.
8.10.4 speaks of a return code of 409 Conflict if a lock can't be granted.
- Firstly, I can't tell if it is saying that the 409 is within the multistatus body... or in the response header.
- Secondly, later text seems to use a different status codes and never mentions this one again.
8.10.7 lists status codes
- 200 OK, 412 Precondition Failed, and 423 Locked are listed, but 409 Conflict (mentioned above) is not.
- In the case of 412 Precondition Failed, the description the follows doesn't seem to describe a "precondition failed". And it sounds like it's talking about an access request that includes a "locktoken", not a LOCK request that generates one.
- The 423 Locked condition also sort of sounds like it's talking about an access request rather than a LOCK request.
8.10.10 lists LOCK status codes
- 207 Multistatus which was not mentioned above
- 403 Forbidden which was not mentioned above.
- 424 Failed dependency which was not mentioned above.
- we don't mention what the failure response should look like.
- comment: 200 OK seems like a better response than 204 No Content. The brief explanation isn't persuasive and seems to say that the response code should serve the purpose of the Content-Length. header.
- we should probably explicitly say if an UNLOCK can only be done on the original resource... and will fail even if the resource specified is locked by virtue of being a child of the original resource. Or is this too obvious? I know it's something easy to goof up in an implementation.
|chat online gratis español international cupid dating and marriage (type: change, status: open)|
|deutschlands beste partnerbörse [email protected]||1999-06-07||
9.4 If header
- BNF suggests that IF's content must be all tagged or all untagged.
- doesn't say if there can be two If headers in a request. Might we want a tagged one and an untagged one?
- I must be misunderstanding this, but it sounds to me like that state of a resource(s) must match one of the locktokens listed in the request. But what if some of the resources are locked and others are not. The unlocked resources definitely won't contain state that's listed. Are we precluding operations on regions that might not be entirely locked? -- Is this a valid observation or a red herring?
18.104.22.168 If header - untagged example
- See my comment about regions that are not entirely locked.
9.4.2 If header -tagged state
- So if we've applied a lock with depth.... and now we're doing a DELETE on a subtree of that tree and we've tagged the locktoken we've submitted, will this prevent that locktoken from apply'ing to ALL the resources of the subtree... and thus prevent the COPY from succeeding? Or are we supposed to tag the lock token with the root of the LOCK even if that is not part of what we are deleting? Or should the request use untagged locktokens?
9.4.3 If header - NOT operator
- Why do we want this? of course... why not? :-)
Overall, the If header seems backwards for locktokens. It's client driven rather than server semantics driven. The only feature it seems to provide is perhaps the ability for the client to request that the request be aborted if the resource no longer is locked. Other than that it seems to complicate the simple process of letting the server know what tokens you hold. I'd think we'd just want a different header to declare what lock tokens we hold and let the server (not the client) decide how they affect the success of the request.
|singles wandern im saarland [email protected]||2004-04-24||This issue needs to be handled in the base protocol.|
|heavenly hearts international dating marriage agency premier international dating and marriage (type: change, status: open)|
|weibliche singles im saarland [email protected]||1999-06-07||
Shared locks... read locks...
Our justifcation for shared locks ("Shared locks are included because....") seems faulty. It's not a mechansim for dealing with programs that forget to release their locks. That remains a problem with shared locks. In this case they'd forget to release a shared lock and block exclusive lock users. Timeouts and administrative action are the solutions to this problem... not shared locks.
BTW, I'd think that the use of exclusive locks is just fine. I do have a problem with shared locks though... or at least shared write locks. Although they were relatively easy to define, I see them as solving a red herring problem of multiple entites cooperatively writing using distinct locks. I say it's a red herring because they don't know each other well enough to use the same lock but they do know each other well enough to not step on each other. This seems unlikely. As does the managing a compatibility matrix and getting all the entities to abide by it.
OTOH I see another more common problem that is being overlooked. I see a class of folks whose purpose is to not actually write to a (set of) resource(s), but to simply prevent others from writing to it while they are looking at it. Shared write locks do not necessarily do that because with a shared write lock. someone else could grab a shared lock and go ahead and write. The only way to block that is to get an exclusive write lock. But doing that prevents anyone else from doing what you're doing despite it being pretty benign.
An expedient solution is to say that a shared write lock should not necessarily give one the right to modify a resource. All it should do is prevent others from writing. And then the purpose of an exclusive write lock is just to insure that others can't get a lock and block you from writing. Now is this the right solution? Probably not. There probably should be something called a read lock that actually prevents writes as a side effect.... and would tend to get used in shared mode.
Anyway, as it is, I think the shared write locks are a red herring and we're missing something we are more likely to need... shared read locks.
|wo treffen sich singles im saarland [email protected]||2004-04-24||Agreement that the rational for shared locks either needs to be rewritten or deleted. However shared locks are a fact, and we shouldn't change the semantics given in RFC2518.|
|partnervermittlung latina yahoo partnersuche jappy youtube (type: change, status: open)|
|singles aus saarland [email protected]||1999-07-23||If a URL ending in a slash is null locked, is it legal to do a PUT to it? That is, does the URL ending in slash set the resource type to a collection, or does the first PUT/MKCOL set the resource to a ordinary, or collection resource.|
|Resolution: LNRs removed. See discussions preceding conclusion: latina frauen partnervermittlung|
|singlebörse frankfurt kostenlos ang dating daan church of god international (type: change, status: open)|
|singles in saarland [email protected]||1999-07-23||In some cases, such as when the parent collection of a resource is locked, a 423 (Locked) status code is returned even though the resource identified by the Request-URI is not locked. This can be confusing, since it is not possible for a client to easily discover which resource is causing the locked status code to be returned. An improved status report would indicate the resource causing the lock message.|
|größte partnerbörse deutschland [email protected]||2004-04-25||Proposal to define a specific precondition element plus specific child elements similar to international thanksgiving ang dating daan.|
|ang dating daan international contradiction teachings beste partnersuche test (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn quoka [email protected]||1999-11-23||things to write about yourself on a dating site states that a LOCK method request SHOULD have an XML request body. This SHOULD should instead be MUST.|
|partnersuche bochum kostenlos [email protected]||2004-04-25||Clarify that for creating LOCKs, it MUST have a request body which SHOULD have the DAV:owner element. For LOCK refreshes, no body is required.|
|good things to write about yourself on a dating website partnerbörsen kostenlos youtube (type: change, status: open)|
|elitepartner christliche partnersuche cpd [email protected]||1999-11-26||international dating site free states, "If a lock owner causes the URI of a resource to be added as an internal member URI of a locked collection then the new resource MUST be automatically added to the lock." However, though this is the intent, the specification does not explicitly state that this behavior only applies to depth infinity locked collections. The words "Depth infinity" should be added before the word "locked" in this sentence.|
|elitepartner christliche partnersuche ch [email protected]||2004-04-25||Clarify as part of integrating GULP.|
|international dating site international dating site spain (type: change, status: open)|
|single treff 50 plus gebraucht [email protected]||2000-01-27||The fact that use of authentication credentials with submission of lock tokens is required should be strengthened in the document.|
|single treff 50 plus gewichtszunahme [email protected]||2004-05-02||Submitting the lock token in an If header (usages != UNLOCK) SHOULD be restricted to whatever the server thinks the "owner" of the lock is.|
|partnervermittlung latina namen partnervermittlung latina zeitschrift (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche peine sie sucht ihn [email protected]||2000-03-04||The specification is currently silent on how to use the If header for submitting a locktoken when performing a DELETE in a Depth infinity locked collection. Should the If header have both the collection URL and the Request-URI, or just the Request-URI? An example of this is needed.|
|partnersuche de register index page internet [email protected]||2004-04-25||Clarify as part of integrating GULP. May need to test interop with existing implementations.|
|partnervermittlung latina zitieren 057_LOCK_SEMANTICS (type: change, status: open)|
|At present, the WebDAV specification is not excruciatingly explicit that writing to a locked resource requires the combination of the lock token, plus an authentication principal. At one point, the spec. discusses an "authorized" principal, but "authorized" is never explicitly defined.|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn ebay [email protected]||2004-05-02||Submitting the lock token in an If header (usages != UNLOCK) SHOULD be restricted to whatever the server thinks the "owner" of the lock is.|
|partnervermittlung latina contatti 058_LOCK_SEIZURE (type: change, status: closed)|
|Should it be possible to seize a lock, or for any principal to unlock a lock, thus making it easier for another client to begin working on a locked resource.|
|Resolution: Duplicated by UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNER issue.|
|best global dating sites biggest free international dating site (type: change, status: open)|
|dating websites for gay [email protected]||2000-07-11||stiftung warentest partnersuche wien of RFC 2518 indicates that clients may submit a lock refresh without a body. However, it implies that clients could submit a lock refresh with a body. Server implementations have been disallowing a lock refresh with a body. It might make sense to codify this practice, and disallow submission of a body on a lock refresh.|
|best dating websites for lgbt [email protected]||2004-04-25||Clarify that LOCK refresh MUST NOT have a request body. Also clarify Lock-Token header vs If header.|
|best dating website for millionaires 063_LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY (type: change, status: open)|
|gratis kontaktbörse kostenlos [email protected]||Is the complexity of the IF header appropriate for the simple task o verifying that a client knowingly owns a lock? The IF header seems to serve a different purpose. One of those purposes is for the server to verify that you have the lock token (and that you know the root of it?). Another is for the client to check some preconditions before doing an action. Another seems to be to specify what lock to refresh in a lock refresh request. This seems to create ambiguity in our definition of the semantics of the IF: header.|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn gelsenkirchen [email protected]||It is felt by the group that it's important that the client not just own and hold the lock token, but that it also know where the lock is rooted before it does tasks related to that lock. This still leaves the lock referesh issue unresolved.|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn garmisch [email protected]||2004-04-25||Need Lock-Token header to indicate the lock to be refreshed.|
|best dating site to meet millionaires partnersuche jappy suche (type: change, status: open)|
|singles saarland umgebung [email protected]||What do you return if the unlock request specifies a URL on which the lock does not reside? What if it's on a URL that is locked by the lock, but it's not the resource where the lock is rooted?|
|Resolution: Resolved that you can specify any URL locked by the lock you want to unlock. (dating for millionaires uk) We should resolve the issue of UNLOCK'ing other URLs in a few days.|
|gibt es partnerbörsen die kostenlos sind 066_MUST_AN_IF_HEADER_CHECK_THE_ROOT_OF_URL (type: change, status: open)|
|Right now the server uses the IF: header to verify that a client knows what locks it has that are affected by an operation before it allows the operation. Must the client provide the root URL of a lock, any URL for a pertainent loc, or some specific URL in the IF: header.|
|single treff 50 plus nebenwirkungen [email protected]||It is felt by the group that it's important that the client not just own and hold the lock token, but that it also know where the lock is rooted before it does tasks related to that lock. This is just a point of info. The issue itself still needs to be brought up and answered.still|
|partnervermittlung ksenia droben partnersuche jappy löschen (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche im internet test leitung [email protected]||Shouldn't we be using an IF header to do an UNLOCK seeing as you need to prove you are holding a lock before you can remove it? (This might be contingent on LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY)|
|free dating sites meet millionaires free dating websites for millionaires (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche de spam hotmail [email protected]||What should UNLOCK return if a bad token is provided or no token. (This might be contingent on UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER.)|
|online free chats in india best online international dating site (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn ingolstadt [email protected]||The LOCK renewal request should not us an IF header to specify what lock is being renewed. This limits the use of the IF header.|
|elitepartner christliche partnersuche wien [email protected]||2004-04-25||Need Lock-Token header to indicate the lock to be refreshed.|
|frau sucht deutschen mann zum heiraten partnersuche schweiz akademiker jobbörse (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn zurück [email protected]||If a LOCK request is submitted to a URL that doesn't have a parent collection, what should be the correct response? Other methods, PUT, MKCOL, COPY, MOVE all require a 409 response in this case. Seems like LOCK should have this requirement as well.|
|Resolution: Resolved that since LNRs no longer exist (see NULL_RESOURCE_CLARIFY) the server should return 409. We should insure that the new text we add to replace LNRs does not create an ambiguity: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2002JanMar/0164.html|
|partnervermittlung latina bedeutung partnervermittlung latina italien (type: change, status: open)|
|singles mit kind partnersuche kostenlos deutschland [email protected]||If the DAV:lockdiscovery property is requested from an unlocked resource, what is the correct response? Apache mod_dav responds with an empty mod_dav sends an empty lockdiscovery element (<D:lockdiscovery/>) while IIS sends an empty prop element (<D:prop/>), that is, it sends no lockdiscovery element at all.|
|singles mit kind partnersuche kostenlos dresden [email protected]||2004-04-25||The difference shouldn't matter for clients, and they need to expect both. In general, servers that DO support locks on that resource should return an empty element.|
|partnervermittlung latina vertretungsplan dating services for millionaires (type: change, status: open)|
|bauer sucht frau 2013 anschauen kostenlos [email protected]||What status code should be returned when a lock null resource is created - 200 OK or 201 Created? A related issue is what status code should be returned by a PUT or MKCOL on a lock-null resource? MKCOL is defined to be 201, PUT could be 200 or 201 (201 seems like a slightly better choice).|
|Resolution: Resolved via the proposal to remove LNR and replace them with ordinary resources and by the following wording: dating sites for millionaires.|
|free online dating for the rich 079_UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNER (type: change, status: open)|
|bauer sucht frau 2013 kostenlos sehen [email protected]||At present, the specification is not explicit about who might be capable of grabbing a lock token via lock discovery and the submitting it in UNLOCK (and/or for a subsequent write operation). It is OK for the resource owner to grab the lock token and do UNLOCK/write? Is it OK to have a "grab lock token" privilege that can be assigned to anyone?|
|Resolution: Resolved in part by putting it under ACL control: deutsche dating app quebec and the response that follows it.|
|deutsche dating app questions 080_DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (type: change, status: open)|
|Proposal to remove lock null resources from the spec until we are motivated to have them or something equivalent. In the meantime, keep the spec silent on the topic in order to avoid precluding LNR or the equivalent in a future version of WebDAV.|
|Resolution: LNRs removed. See discussions preceding conclusion: top free christian dating sites and beste deutsche dating apps.|
|chat für erwachsene ohne anmeldung 088_DAVOWNER_FIELD_IS_CLIENT_CONTROLED (type: change, status: open)|
|The DAV:owner field of a lock is controlled by the locking client and should not be manipulated by the server. This is the only place the client can store info. The roundtrip details should match what we resolve for the PROP_ROUNDTRIP issue. Examples should also be checked.|
|Resolution: Resolved by repeated statement and no disagreement.|
|deutsche dating app vergleich online chat welt kostenlos (type: change, status: open)|
|dating sites for gay professionals [email protected]||It would be good if a client could look at a locked resource that it was planning to unlock and also find out if it's depth locked and where the depth lock is rooted.|
|Resolution: Proposed solution: reiche männer suchen frau approved.|
|deutsche dating app tinder deutsche dating app facebook (type: change, status: closed)|
|dating service for gay professionals [email protected]||How does a client determine if a given lock was created by it?|
|Resolution: It was resolved that this type of info would not be provided by the server. The client creating the lock could store owner info in the DAV:owner field (or some field defined in the future) if it wishes. The querying client can also check ACL's to get similar info.|
|partnersuche jappy ignorieren partnersuche jappy impressum (type: change, status: closed)|
|gay dating website for professionals [email protected]||There might not be any implementations of shared locks. If so, remove them.|
|Resolution: The thread did conclude that shared locks interoperate although it doesn't look like they get used much. Also see: deutsche dating app kostenlos.|
|deutsche dating app android chat für erwachsene ohne registrierung (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn tegernsee [email protected]||What resource should be flagged in the multistatus response to locking issues in COPY/MOVE requests?|
|Resolution: Resolved to flag the locking errors at the source resource that was affected by the problem. The details of how to describe the error was deferred to a subsequent version of WebDAV. - 6/15/02 - 2518bis does not reflect this.|
|chatroulette für erwachsene partnersuche jappy zeichen (type: change, status: open)|
|The method of describing the details of (beyond what resolved by COPYMOVE_LOCKED_STATUS_CODE_CLARIFICATION) of the underlying cause of various locking and ACL COPY/MOVE problems is deferred. Two proposals were outlined in the discussion, but interest was not great and we clearly don't have interoperability to take these proposals forward.|
|liebeskummer chat für erwachsene christliche partnervermittlung your love quote (type: change, status: open)|
|partnersuche sie sucht ihn thüringen [email protected]||There is some confusion on how a PROPFIND response should express the fact that a resource has multiple shared locks on it. It was suggested that the spec become clearer.|
|Resolution: Resolved trivially that it's probably worthwhile to demonstrate a correc response for this situation in one of the examples.|
|chat für erwachsene youtube christliche partnervermittlung your love mp3 (type: change, status: open)|
|elitepartner christliche partnersuche de [email protected]||If one finds a locked resource, it might be one of several resource locked by a depth lock. How does one determine the root of the lock?|
|Resolution: Resolved to support a dav:lockroot element in the lock discovery property: deutsche dating app review|
|flirt chat für erwachsene chat fuer erwachsene (type: change, status: open)|
|elitepartner christliche partnersuche deutschland [email protected]||chat für erwachsene states that a dav:locktoken tag can have multiple <dav:href> tags in it. Is this right? And is it trying to suggest that a single (shared) lock might have multiple locktokens?|
|Resolution: It is resolved that section 12.1.2 was incorrect and that only a single lock token URI should be allowed there. Also it is resolved that a lock only has a single lock token.|
gay dating site gaydar This document is the collaborative product of partnervermittlung latina online
gaydargirls dating site This document has also benefited from thoughtful discussion by Mark Anderson, Dan Brotksy, Geoff Clemm, Jim Davis, Stefan Eissing, Rickard Falk, Larry Masinter, Joe Orton, Juergen Pill, Elias Sinderson, Greg Stein, Kevin Wiggen, and other members of the WebDAV working group.
partnersuche scout24 ch Copyright © The Internet Society (2004).partnersuche in cottbus zoo
partnersuche für singles login This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.christliche singletreffs in deutschland
partnersuche ab 50 schwierig kreuzworträtsel This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.singles mit kind partnersuche kostenlos online
free top 10 dating sites The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.kontakte zu frauen mit handynummer
free top 10 online dating sites Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at www partnersuche deutschland kostenlos.singles mit kind partnersuche kostenlos youtube
partnervermittlung gleichklang schweiz The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at partnersuche in cottbus xxl.christliche singletreffen bern